~ Pikaso Potolani writes

BLANTYRE: — 
Malawi’s Constitution allows a seven-day window for presidential transition following election day, intended to ensure a smooth handover of duties and responsibilities.

However, critics argue that this period has become a costly loophole for last-minute decisions that burden an already struggling population—most of whom live below the poverty line.

Outgoing President Lazarus Chakwera is alleged to have made a series of controversial moves during his final days in office, raising concerns about governance and accountability. Sources reporting widespread misuse of public resources at state residences including Sanjika, Kamuzu Palace, Chikoko Bay, and Mzuzu.

One of the most contentious decisions was Chakwera’s approval of a steep fuel price hike—from K2,500 to K3,500 per litre—sanctioned by the Malawi Energy Regulatory Authority. Economic analysts have criticized the move as unjustified, especially in light of the Reserve Bank of Malawi’s recent monetary policy report.

Further reports suggest irregularities at the Central Bank and the National Economic Empowerment Fund (NEEF), prompting police to seal off offices amid allegations of financial mismanagement. Despite his term ended, Chakwera also authorized promotions for senior officials across civil service and parastatal institutions.

Now, all eyes are on newly sworn-in President Professor Peter Arthur Mutharika, who took office at Kamuzu Stadium in Blantyre. In his inaugural address, Mutharika pledged a zero-tolerance stance on corruption and emphasized the need for accountability.

The pressing question remains: will President Mutharika investigate and hold his predecessor accountable for decisions made during the transition period, or will Malawi’s governance challenges persist unchecked?